For the latest shared monthly observation, 2026-08, Copper was 14,326.00 USD per tonne and Zinc was 3,875.00 USD per tonne. Latest shared monthly release. The chart indexes both series to 100 at their first shared date.
Copper and zinc are separate refined-metal markets and can also be inputs to brass. Comparing them can help frame two input references, but it does not calculate the price of a particular brass grade. Copper is commonly associated here with power cables · construction · electric motors; Zinc with galvanising · die casting · alloys.
Choose another pair to open its canonical comparison destination.
61 monthly observations · 2021-08-01 to 2026-08-01 · Starting value = 100
World Bank Pink Sheet. Ratios use aligned prices; yearly figures average monthly observations.
Copper vs Zinc price comparison historical observations
Period
Copper index
Zinc index
2026-08-01
152.89
129.69
2026-07-01
144.54
120.45
2026-06-01
144.63
118.44
2026-05-01
144.54
116.53
2026-04-01
138.22
112.58
2026-03-01
133.71
106.49
2026-02-01
138.22
111.24
2026-01-01
138.87
107.53
2025-12-01
125.77
106.02
2025-11-01
115.39
106.33
2025-10-01
114.62
105.49
2025-09-01
106.55
98.16
2025-08-01
103.20
93.34
2025-07-01
104.28
92.47
2025-06-01
104.96
88.86
2025-05-01
101.74
88.49
2025-04-01
97.94
87.75
2025-03-01
103.95
96.69
2025-02-01
99.58
93.71
2025-01-01
95.96
94.34
2024-12-01
95.15
101.54
2024-11-01
96.86
100.54
2024-10-01
101.75
103.95
2024-09-01
98.58
94.95
Copper and Zinc: the monthly snapshot.
This snapshot uses the latest shared monthly observation and an initial five-year window, shortened when the common archive is smaller. It stays on that labelled basis when you explore another chart range above.
Copper · USD / tonne14,326.00
Zinc · USD / tonne3,875.00
Shared observation month2026-08
Shared monthly observations61
World Bank Pink Sheet. Monthly averages; not executable transaction quotes.
From 2021-08 to 2026-08, the shared monthly window changed +52.89% for Copper and +29.69% for Zinc. The endpoint difference was 23.21 index points. This describes the selected historical window, not a forecast.
Copper change over this window
+52.89% from 2021-08 to 2026-08.
Zinc change over this window
+29.69% over the same observation dates.
What separates these markets?
Copper
Copper is an industrial benchmark normally quoted per metric tonne. Prices depend on grade, location and delivery; refined copper prices are not scrap-yard offers.
Both source series use USD per tonne. Matching units make the nominal figures easier to read together, but Copper and Zinc still have separate specifications and markets.
Market context
Both sit in industrial metals, yet their stated uses differ: Copper — Power cables · Construction · Electric motors; Zinc — Galvanising · Die casting · Alloys. A shared category does not make the products substitutes.
Shared history
The overlapping selectable frequencies are monthly and yearly. Daily comparison is offered only when both stored series have daily coverage; otherwise monthly observations provide the common basis.
Key relationships in plain English
These subject–relationship–object facts keep the two commodities, their units and the chart method separate.
Semantic relationships between Copper and Zinc
Subject
Relationship
Object
Why it matters
Copper
is published in
USD per tonne
Read copper in its original source unit before converting it.
Zinc
is published in
USD per tonne
Read zinc in its original source unit before converting it.
Copper
is used in
Power cables · Construction · Electric motors
These uses provide context for copper demand; they do not explain every price move.
Zinc
is used in
Galvanising · Die casting · Alloys
These uses provide context for zinc demand; they do not explain every price move.
Copper versus Zinc
is aligned on
61 shared monthly observations from 2021-08 through 2026-08
The chart compares matching dates and gives both series a starting index of 100.
Refined copper, delivered material and scrap
The copper reference is a refined-metal benchmark, normally published per metric tonne. It is a starting point for understanding broad movements rather than a quote for a cable reel, a fabricated component or a mixed scrap load. Converting the price to kilograms changes the mass basis but does not change the material specification.
Processing and supply: Mining, refining and recycling affect available material. A refined benchmark does not value ore or mixed recovered metal directly.
A zinc benchmark is not a galvanised-product price
The zinc reference tracks metal rather than the finished products in which it is used. A galvanised component includes steel, processing and other costs. Applying a zinc reference to its whole weight would overstate zinc content and omit the product’s other materials.
Alloy and casting uses: Die casting and alloys use specified zinc-containing compositions. A finished casting includes fabrication costs beyond the reference metal.
Interpretation for this pair. Copper and zinc are separate refined-metal markets and can also be inputs to brass. Comparing them can help frame two input references, but it does not calculate the price of a particular brass grade. Copper is commonly associated here with power cables · construction · electric motors; Zinc with galvanising · die casting · alloys. The chart uses only dates present in both series and starts each at 100. Missing observations are omitted rather than filled with zero.
When this comparison is useful.
Copper and zinc are separate refined-metal markets and can also be inputs to brass. Comparing them can help frame two input references, but it does not calculate the price of a particular brass grade.
Brass needs a composition
A finished brass product has a specified copper–zinc mix and may include other elements. Its price also includes fabrication and delivery, so two benchmark prices are not a finished-product quote.
End uses remain different
Copper has major electrical uses; zinc is widely used for galvanising. Demand changes in cable, construction or coated steel can affect the two references differently.
Use aligned monthly movement
The indexed chart places both tonne-based series at 100 on a shared date. It compares direction and scale of movement without treating the metals as equal products.
Questions about copper and zinc.
What did the shared Copper and Zinc window show?
From 2021-08 to 2026-08, the shared monthly window changed +52.89% for Copper and +29.69% for Zinc. The endpoint difference was 23.21 index points. This describes the selected historical window, not a forecast. Change the chart range to test another starting point; the labelled monthly snapshot keeps its own initial window.
Which Copper and Zinc frequencies overlap?
The overlapping selectable frequencies are monthly and yearly. Daily comparison is offered only when both stored series have daily coverage; otherwise monthly observations provide the common basis.
Can Copper and Zinc price levels be compared directly?
Both source series use USD per tonne. Matching units make the nominal figures easier to read together, but Copper and Zinc still have separate specifications and markets. The indexed view answers how each stored reference moved from a shared starting date; it does not calculate a transaction return.
What should I check before comparing Copper and Zinc?
Both sit in industrial metals, yet their stated uses differ: Copper — Power cables · Construction · Electric motors; Zinc — Galvanising · Die casting · Alloys. A shared category does not make the products substitutes. Also confirm the observation date, grade or purity, delivery terms and costs that apply to the actual product.